danieldwilliam: (Default)
[personal profile] danieldwilliam

I find myself on the horns of a dilemma.

I’m trying to set up a programme of speakers for the 2013 Edinburgh Democracy User Group In the Pub meetings. One of our decisions at the planning meeting for this was to invite all the major political parties to send a speaker to talk to us about their parties core values and how they make decisions internally.

My working definition of “major” is any British party that holds a seat at the European, Westminster or Holyrood Parliaments. I’ve excluding Welsh and Northern Irish parties on the grounds of logistics, although if anyone can find a Plaid Cymru member in Edinburgh I’d be delighted to buy them a pint of Brains.

So, I’ve invited Conservative, Labour, SNP, Lib Dem, Green, Respect and UKIP speakers.

It’s not that I’m not happy to have speakers from other parties. I’d be delighted but my first objective is to invite the major parties and I wanted a rule of thumb to apply when I said I was going to spend time trying to get a speaker from X party but not as much time trying to get a speaker from Y party.

The problem is, my definition of major includes the BNP. They currently hold two seats at the European Parliament.

I’m genuinely in two minds about inviting them to speak. On the grounds that they have a democratic mandate should we engage with them. Should we deny them a platform because they are anti-democratic (and are they anti-democratic?)  Are we wiser if we know our enemy or is a fool’s errand to give them a platform?

Suggestions from the floor welcome.

Date: 2012-10-09 03:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] f4f3.livejournal.com
I think growing up in an environment where gay people are shown as being normal, open, and accepted parts of society makes it less likely that they will frighten your elephant. And I love the fact that I'm somewhere in a middle generation on this, somewhere between Turing and Tatchel in terms of the normalacy of homosexuality.

Date: 2012-10-09 03:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] widgetfox.livejournal.com
Not with you on a Turing - Tatchell continuum - both seem to find / have found homosexuality entirely normal.

Date: 2012-10-10 02:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] f4f3.livejournal.com
I was thinking of society's view of homosexuals, rather than their own self-image. Turing was hounded to death before I was born, and Tatchell was operating as an openly gay politician in my early adulthood - so I've been able to watch that process of acceptance by society as it evolves.

Date: 2012-10-10 02:44 pm (UTC)

Profile

danieldwilliam: (Default)
danieldwilliam

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112 131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 5th, 2026 09:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios