On Mis-Hearing on the Meadows (probably)

[danieldwilliam]

Yesterday evening on the way home from mannnig the box office for my theatre groups show I *think* I overheard this snippet of conversation between two University age kids

“…it’s for when they do anal to your face…”

Now, I’m not naïve enough to think a twenty year old guy and girl won’t be sitting outside Starbucks talking about anal sex. Hell I was doing exactly that nearly 20 years ago, except that we didn’t have Starbucks (Kids, once upon a time if you wanted to talk about anal sex you had to go to the pub.)

What baffles is me is that the line makes no sense and I can’t think of a way that I might of mis-heard the line that does make sense.

So my question for the internet today is – what could that snippet of speech actually be that that I could mis-hear it as

 “…it’s for when they do anal to your face…”

?

Comments

[widgetfox.livejournal.com]

Love that song.

[danieldwilliam.livejournal.com]

That slightly surprises me – not sure why.

[f4f3.livejournal.com]

And that's me earwormed...

[andrewducker]

I'm wondering if it could be "...it's for when they do a ??? to your face"

Where "to your face" is "right in front of you" and they're doing something they shouldn't, and doing it in an up front manner.

I could be _completely_ wrong though.

[f4f3.livejournal.com]

So for "anal", you could maybe read "Amyl"?

[danieldwilliam.livejournal.com]

That would make sense and the phrase could well be

"it's for when they do "Aha! In YOUR face!"

[danieldwilliam.livejournal.com]

That also makes sense.

Do kids still do amyl nowadays?