danieldwilliam: (electoral reform)

I’ve just had the most amazing conversation.  Angus Reid Scottish artist is a work in play about a Call for a Constitution.  He’s written a poem, based on a statement of shared values discussed at a series of workshops he ran. The poem is currently on display at 12 locations

http://www.angusreid.co.uk/present/exhibition/actions/Call-For-A-Constitution/

Each poem has a large, large piece of white paper next to it and people are invited to put their hand on the paper and draw round their hand and sign it.  I’ve just seen the First Minister’s hand on it, near the Lib Dem MSP for Orkney and various others.

He’ll be talking about his work and the process of engaging people in democracy at the Scottish Parliament on 25th September and at each of the other 11 venues around the country.

The experience more than makes up for a conversation I had on twitter about political economics and entrepreneurship in a post-Independence Scotland (at least that’s what I thought it was about.) Which confirmed once again that twitter is a poor medium for nuanced conversations of any sort, but certainly for politics and economics and science or those areas where they overlap.

Here is the poem. I hope it cheers and enthuses you as much as it did me.

If I as a writer of poetry

Were called up to give a form of words

To model the nation’s behaviour

It would be this

Ownership obliges

Everyone to respect and to care for

The sacred

To respect and to care for

Freedom of conscience

 And to recognise

The gift of every indvidual

To respect it

Care for it, nourish it

To care for and protect communities

And

To care for the land

And whereever

The land has been abused to restore it

So that it can support all forms fo life

Five principles, five fingers on the hand.

danieldwilliam: (Default)

I had forgotten how much I loved Paul Simon’s Graceland.  If I could be any poet it would be Paul Simon.

I saw the Imagine documentary on the creation of this album, the musical and political history of the creation of the work.

The album came out when I was 11. My father brought it with him on one of his many visits to Australia to see me and my siblings.  It was the soundtrack to our road trip around Tasmania. I was perhaps 12 when I first heard it.

I remember being entranced by the swirling rhythms of the music and how they carried Simon’s lyrics away. I remember the explosion of the  African sounds and the explosion of the other sounds. I remember the mixture of hope and cynicism in the lyrics.

What I heard there, that I recognise now but didn’t then, were several traditions of African music; blues, gospel, Zulu a cappella, township being woven into each other and into European traditions with the clever, clever New York Jewish lyrics.

Whenever I hear the opening bars of Boy in the Bubble I am taken anew to the familiar synthesis of Africa, New York and the road east of Adelaide.

One of the themes of the documentary was the tension between the breaking of the cultural boycott and the rights of artists, of individuals to do the best that they can. Simon recalls a conversation he had with an ANC manager who was telling him he should have asked permission to do the album. He should have asked permission from a government in waiting to create his art with whomever he wanted? And this seeking of permission would have been a blow against apartheid?

Whilst discussing the cultural boycott with a old-time from Artists against Apartheid Simon said something along the lines of

-At the top you have politicians. And behind them some shadowy money men and campaigners. Underneath the politicians come economists and military types. Then, below them are the artists. We get a call, come and do a concert for this cause and it’s like we work for the politicians. That we’re not artists in our own right.

Should Simon have gone to South African or stayed away?  Should his right to freely collaborate and the right of the other artists working on Graceland  given or taken priority to the needs of a larger freedom movement?  What the right answer is I’m not sure but I find a lot of my political thinking at the moment circling around the ability of the group to enforce behaviour on the individual in the long term best interests of the group.

The album sounds to me like one of the purest forms of post-apartheid multi-culturalism I've ever heard.

I’m left with the feeling that the work is a brilliant piece of collaborative musicianship and that it, if it had a political point, it was “Hey listen to this, this is the sound of us all being free. This is the prize.”

It remains, perhaps, my best loved music.

Profile

danieldwilliam: (Default)
danieldwilliam

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18 192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 09:52 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios