danieldwilliam: (Default)
I was thinking over the weekend about the sort of technologies that will be useful in a world with significant climate change. I’ve come up with a tentative list of technologies that I think will do one of the following 1) reduce the chance of climate change occurring (or push it back in time) 2) reduce the direct impacts on human civilisation and prosperity of climate change 3) help us adapt and change more easily. This list is below. I’ve stuck a very short note on why I think they are important. Do feel free to comment with your own suggestions. Or to disagree with my selections. Or add other reasons why my selections are helpful.
I’ll be revisiting the list later so will update with additions, deletions and changes and then my plan is to spend a little time over the coming year doing a bit of a survey of the state of the art and the state of the ordinary for each technology. Some of them I’m very familiar with and some I know next to nothing about.
1. Energy – Renewable Electricity Availability

Being able to actually run the world’s energy requirements in a zero-CO2 way at approximately the same cost as today.

2. Energy – Renewable Energy is Very Cheap

Cheap (and I mean very, very cheap) energy makes a lot of currently existing technology able to be deployed at large scale. For example, desalinating water and pumping it long distances is prohibitively energy intensive when energy is expensive. Pulling CO2 out of the atmosphere and converting it to fertiliser is also prohibitively expensive when energy is expensive.

3. Energy – Electrictification of Everything

The more things are electrified the easier it is to decarbonise their energy use.

4. Food – Vat Grown Meat

Meat production uses a lot of land and water. Not eating meat from live animals is a good way to avoid that resource use.

5. Food – Alternatives to animal protein

Meat production uses a lot of land and water. Not eating meat is a good way to avoid that resource use.

6. Food – drought resistant crops

In a world with more drought more drought resistant crops will help with food security.

7. Food – alternatives to palm oil and corn syrup

Both of these products are responsible for a lot of deforestation and we’ll need lots of trees.

8. Food – alternatives to agriculturally grown food

If we could grow all our food in wareshouses on the outskirts of our cities those cities could be anywhere and not reliant on any actual climate situation.

9. Tunnel Boring

Useful for mass transit systems and for building pumped hydro energy storage systems – which would be helpful if they were cheap to build and able to be built in more places.

10. Mass and Public Transport

Reducing fuel consumption and making dense cities more livable in.

11. Battery Tech

Energy density by mass and by volume. Life expectancy by time and cycles. Alternatives to lithium in production and alternatives to Lithium-Ion batteries in general, including ones more suited to bulk energy storage.

12. Lithium Seawater Extraction

The current best battery tech uses lithium. Lithium needs to be in plentiful supply. Being able to extract it from seawater cheaply would put a cap on lithium pricing.

13. Desalination

Water, probably important.

14. Autonomous Vehicles

Makes cities more livable, avoids lots of the costs of production of individual vehicles, makes cities more movable about in, helps public transport directly and indirectly.
15. Housing Energy Efficiency

Running homes in an energy efficient way will help avoid using energy and also reducing fuel poverty.
16. Geo-engineering

We may have to paint ourselves white to deflect the blast or the climate change equivalent.
17. Passive Cooling

In a warming world being able to keep cool without using energy is helpful.

18. Super Conductors

Very useful for long-range energy transmission and also for energy efficiency.

19. Super Computing for Weather Prediction

If the weather is going to be more extreme than very good predictions will help avoid loss of life and infrastructure

20. CO2 sequestration (forestry, CCS, pulling raw carbon out of the air, bio-char, carbon sequestration in building materials

We may need to actually pull CO2 out of the atmosphere.

21. Low Carbon / Negative Carbon concrete

Concrete releases a lot of CO2. Having concrete alternatives that are low CO2 or even better CO2 sequestering would be very helpful.

22. Iron and Steel coking alternatives

Lots of CO2 is produced in the steel industry. It’s energy intensive and use carbon as an input.

23. Fertiliser manufacturing

Fertilisers are a major product of fossil fuels and a major input to food production and a big opportunity to balance intermittent renewable electricity production with intermittent demand.

24. Subsea cabling


25. Treatments for antibiotic resistant bacteria

We do not need to add in any more pandemics to the world. Especially ones we can’t treat.

26. Tropical Medicine

With more of the world warm and more of the warm parts of the world also rich tropical medicine will be useful.

27. Aviation fuel alternatives

CO2 released from aircraft appears to be worse for climate change than CO2 released from a car. Also the energy density needed for long range air travel is a challenge.

28. Synthetic hydrocarbons to plastics industry

Reducing demand for fossil fuels and sequestering carbon in plastics

29. Recycling

Nothing is more energy efficient than not making something from new raw materials.

30. Synthetic textiles

A move away from especially cotton would help keep land for food production.

31. Weed and pest management

Weeds and live pests are going to move around a lot and interact badly with food production which is already having a difficult time. Meanwhile we probably don’t want to be dropping large amounts of expensive chemicals all over our farmland.

32. Autonomous targeted irrigation and fertiliser

Probably a useful way of keeping food production going in areas which are becoming unsuitable for it.

33. Water management and recycling

Water stress is going to be a major problem and a source of conflict. The better we are managing and recycling water the more we can avoid those problems and conflicts.

34. Refugee management

We are going to have many people, some rich, some poor, moving around the world – managing that will be useful

35. Democracy

We are going to have to make some difficult decisions and stick to them – democracy is probably a good way of doing that.
danieldwilliam: (Default)

In converation with Andrew Ducker I wondered aloud how long the effects of climate change would continue for after we stopped emitting carbon dioxide.

 

The best guess seems to be 1,000 years. Some modelling done by the Canadian Center for Climate Modeling and Analysis suggests that even if we stopped emitting CO2 into the atmosphere we would still be experiencing the impact a millenium from now.

 

This appears to be due to the persistence of CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere in the atmosphere. We can expect elevated levels of greenhouse gases for hundreds of years after we stop emitting them. Along side the continued warming effect of greenhouse gases it takes a long time for the additional heat trapped on the surface of the planet to make its way into the various climate systems. The key system for the long tail of climate change seems to be the deeper levels of the southern oceans. Additional heat moves slowly into these systems until it ends up next to the Antartic ice-sheets. These in turn eventually melt leading to an increase in sea-levels of 4 meters.

 

If we stopped emitting CO2 in 2100 the model predicts some 55% of excess carbon emitted during the industrial period would still be in the atmosphere in the year 3000. The changes in climate as a result of the two effects of accumulated climate change persisting into the future and the unwinding of climate change as the distribution of CO2 changes seem to drive significant regional variation with the southern hemisphere seeing increases in tempreture after 2100 and the nothern hemisphere seeing tempretures fall back after 2100.

 

Two big worries flagged up by the model are continuing warming of Antartic seas and the consequent loss of ice from Antartica and a drying effect on northern Africa.

 

The modelling goes out for thousand years and doesn’t appear to show the effects peaking and then reversing over the model’s period.  They are still accumulating a thousand years from now.

 

As a caveat, this is one study. The climate is probably the very definition of a non-linear chaotic system and I think climate change modelling is highly dependent on all sorts of best estimates about things we don’t really understand at all well.  But it’s the best we have.

 

I have to say I’m surprised and dismayed. I’d thought that we would start to see a reversal of climate change within a hundred years or so of us reducing carbon emissions below their aborbsion rates.

 

My source for this is here

 

http://sos.noaa.gov/Docs/ngeo1047-aop.pdf

Profile

danieldwilliam: (Default)
danieldwilliam

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18 192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 30th, 2025 12:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios