On Dave and the Strictly Week 6 scores
Nov. 4th, 2013 02:32 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Well, it had to happen eventually. The Dave Myers Juggernaut of Dance unseats someone who probably didn’t deserve to go. All around the country feckless Strictly watchers who listened to that buffoon Brand and didn’t vote will be wondering how it could possibly be allowed that two people who were not at bad at dancing could have been in the bottom two.
A bit of drive by psephology. It’s obvious that Abbey must have finished bottom or second from bottom in the public vote. If she finished bottom her aggregate score would have been eleven. What is a little less obvious is that quite a few of the top ranked dancers must also have finished quite a way down the public vote leaderboard. In order to avoid the dance off Dave must have finished at least 5th in the public vote. This would give him 11 points overall. He avoids the bottom two by being the most popular of those finishing on 11. Similar stories for Mark and for Fiona. Which implies that one or two of the better ranked dancers have finished quite a way down.
Of course, the gap between the top of the public vote and the bottom of the public vote might very narrow.
I’m guessing here but it looks to me like Dave and Mark are polling very strongly and we can expect a few more upsets in the next few weeks.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-04 03:04 pm (UTC)I think it will always be like this, as long as (i) the scoring mechanism is not transparent, and (ii) voters cannot be convinced that everyone is at risk. It's possible that Abbey's appearance in the bottom two might have gone some way towards the latter, but basically we are an apathetic bunch and continually subject to cognitive bias.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-04 03:15 pm (UTC)(The efficient market hypothesis bookies analysis project is not looking good by the way.)
I think most people would expect the impact of popular hoofers to even out and for a combination of dance leaderboard placing and the judges final decision to mean that the finalists are more or less whom you would hope and expect in a competition that is largely about dancing. My observation is, that with a couple of jokers, we could see a situation again where potential finalists are put up against each other and the final ends up being misshapen as a result. Well, misshapen in my view.
I am, for the record, not finding Dave that amusing any more. Even Darcey’s reaction to Dave and Mark is no longer raising a smile.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-04 03:19 pm (UTC)On the plus side, I am a lot more pro Ben than I was before his paso. That was great.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-04 03:26 pm (UTC)I am totally “meh” about Fiona. She seems an nice enough person but not very interesting. She’s okay as a dancer, a bit variable. I don’t think she’s trying to push the envelope particularly.
I thought Deborah had gone too early. I’d have like to see her stay a few more weeks and get better, or not.
The more I saw of RR the more I liked her.
I didn't see Ben's dance - I think I might have been tangoing with a small boy.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-04 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-04 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-04 03:20 pm (UTC)God, I hope
no subject
Date: 2013-11-04 03:28 pm (UTC)Nice.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-04 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-04 05:12 pm (UTC)Say.
No.
Mo-oore.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-04 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-04 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-04 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-04 07:28 pm (UTC)It does seem like anyone is at risk - it clearly doesn't take much.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-04 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-04 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-04 05:13 pm (UTC)Alas, we'll never know.