So, the question in question is "whether we should extend the right (or the obligation) to be married to some people based on their sexuality"
At the moment, lots of people answer this question in a way that causes people to be treated inequitably.
If that weren't the case... that is, if we all disagreed about whether we should extend the right (or the obligation) to be married to some people based on their sexuality, but we agreed that all other rights, privileges and obligations ought to be allocated equitably, including all of those which are currently contingent on being able to marry, I would consider that question uninterating.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2012-06-14 09:35 pm (UTC)At the moment, lots of people answer this question in a way that causes people to be treated inequitably.
If that weren't the case... that is, if we all disagreed about whether we should extend the right (or the obligation) to be married to some people based on their sexuality, but we agreed that all other rights, privileges and obligations ought to be allocated equitably, including all of those which are currently contingent on being able to marry, I would consider that question uninterating.