![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
My thoughts on a vaccine roll out. It will be September 2021 before anything close to normality returns.
(This is one of those blogposts mostly to layout my thinking and force myself to think something through rather than an attempt to Dunning-Krueger myself or to be oracular.)
The noises from vaccine developers seem muted but nobody has reported a massive failure. Certainly not everybody has reported a massive failure yet.
So we are probably 12 months in to an 18 month process.
That would indicate some sort of effective vaccine being announced in January / February with large scale access to it starting in February / March.
My assumptions for the first round of vaccines are
1) they have limited effectiveness compared to our usual experience of vaccines - fewer people than normal will find them protective and the protection will be less than we usually expect.
2) they will have a more time-bounded effectiveness than we are used to - perhaps six months, or 12 months
3) they will have more side-effects than we usually see, making them either unpleasant for some people or unsuitable for some people.
So useful but not a complete answer to the problem.
I'm assuming that production in the West will be geared up to provide vaccines for their entire populations over a 12-month period with say 10% surplus to be shared / exported / donated with the not-West. China will probably sort itself out quicker. Ditto the South East Asian countries with experience of SARS. Other countries will sort themselves out slower.
There will be a second round of vaccines following on about a year from the first round, these will be better in terms of protection, duration and side-effects.
By the time the vaccination programme starts in the UK I think we'll have had about 5% of the population having had the virus in a way that confers some on-going immunity from the point when the vaccine programme starts. (I'm assuming here lots of asymptomatic cases which have not been spotted.) But I'm also assuming enough churn in immunity to keep that number at 5% through out.
Assume the UK has access to a total of 60 million doses over a 12-month period, or 5 million a month, or 7% of the population a month. Then our immunity level starting in March is 5%. It rises to 12% by the end of April. By the end of September 2021, it's a 60%.
In September we start to see people who only gained a short period of immunity from the vaccine they had in March / April / May become less immune. So, our rate of increase in immunity levels slows.
60% - 70% is probably not enough for herd immunity to kick in. I believe a figure of 80% of the population having some form of immunity is required for a disease as contagious as COVID-19. However, it does mean the spread will be slower. This should help Track and Trace operations.
It would also allow those who have been vaccinated to move around with more liberty and for the country to preferentially vaccinate those who are a) at the most risk of dying b) those at the most risk of spreading the disease.
So, we might see a a limited return to normality around September next year.
(This is one of those blogposts mostly to layout my thinking and force myself to think something through rather than an attempt to Dunning-Krueger myself or to be oracular.)
The noises from vaccine developers seem muted but nobody has reported a massive failure. Certainly not everybody has reported a massive failure yet.
So we are probably 12 months in to an 18 month process.
That would indicate some sort of effective vaccine being announced in January / February with large scale access to it starting in February / March.
My assumptions for the first round of vaccines are
1) they have limited effectiveness compared to our usual experience of vaccines - fewer people than normal will find them protective and the protection will be less than we usually expect.
2) they will have a more time-bounded effectiveness than we are used to - perhaps six months, or 12 months
3) they will have more side-effects than we usually see, making them either unpleasant for some people or unsuitable for some people.
So useful but not a complete answer to the problem.
I'm assuming that production in the West will be geared up to provide vaccines for their entire populations over a 12-month period with say 10% surplus to be shared / exported / donated with the not-West. China will probably sort itself out quicker. Ditto the South East Asian countries with experience of SARS. Other countries will sort themselves out slower.
There will be a second round of vaccines following on about a year from the first round, these will be better in terms of protection, duration and side-effects.
By the time the vaccination programme starts in the UK I think we'll have had about 5% of the population having had the virus in a way that confers some on-going immunity from the point when the vaccine programme starts. (I'm assuming here lots of asymptomatic cases which have not been spotted.) But I'm also assuming enough churn in immunity to keep that number at 5% through out.
Assume the UK has access to a total of 60 million doses over a 12-month period, or 5 million a month, or 7% of the population a month. Then our immunity level starting in March is 5%. It rises to 12% by the end of April. By the end of September 2021, it's a 60%.
In September we start to see people who only gained a short period of immunity from the vaccine they had in March / April / May become less immune. So, our rate of increase in immunity levels slows.
60% - 70% is probably not enough for herd immunity to kick in. I believe a figure of 80% of the population having some form of immunity is required for a disease as contagious as COVID-19. However, it does mean the spread will be slower. This should help Track and Trace operations.
It would also allow those who have been vaccinated to move around with more liberty and for the country to preferentially vaccinate those who are a) at the most risk of dying b) those at the most risk of spreading the disease.
So, we might see a a limited return to normality around September next year.
no subject
Date: 2020-10-05 11:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-10-05 11:58 am (UTC)Is there any reason for what seem pessimistic assumptions? Though better to err on the pessimistic side... "It'll be all over by Christmas [2021]..."!
no subject
Date: 2020-10-05 12:01 pm (UTC)Mind you, I think I might not put myself at the very front of a queue for a vaccine - given that I'm not in a high risk group and not significantly economically impacted by the virus directly.
no subject
Date: 2020-10-05 12:14 pm (UTC)Partly a bit of a psychological buffer against being too optimisitic.
Partly my general assumption that big project, especially those run by a modern state, tend to take a while to get started.
Partly a specific view in the case of early vaccines that we will prioritise getting something useful in to production soonest over getting the best thing in to production a bit later on - but this implies that the things we get in to production soonest won't necessarily be the best. Hopefully I'm wrong on that and we happen to find the best option early on.
no subject
Date: 2020-10-05 05:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-10-05 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-10-05 06:22 pm (UTC)(1) colder so can do less outside.
(2) colder so more spread of virus so more restrictions.
(3) less outside so more inside so more spread of virus so more restrictions.
(4) colder and darker so people are sadder.
no subject
Date: 2020-10-05 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-10-06 11:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-10-06 11:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-10-06 12:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-10-06 12:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-10-06 01:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-10-06 01:22 pm (UTC)If so, I think that is my current assumption also and underpins my guess that large scale production starts shortly after approval. Instead of say, 6 months after approval.
no subject
Date: 2020-10-06 01:23 pm (UTC)I do not envy those working in Syria, Yemen, Afghanistan or Brazil to be honest - that's going to be hard work and probably dangerous.
no subject
Date: 2020-10-06 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-10-06 01:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-10-06 01:52 pm (UTC)That's not good.
no subject
Date: 2020-10-06 01:55 pm (UTC)That is good news and would accelerate my time table by a few months. At least. Awesome.
I may get to go and see something in the Edinburgh Fringe for my birthday after all.
no subject
Date: 2020-10-06 04:06 pm (UTC)