![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
I was reading this post
https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2021/09/fossil-fuels-are-dead.html#comments
on Charles Stross' blog, and the comments, and it occurred to me that I see a similar set of arguments advanced whenever renewables are discussed. Specifically when considering how (and whether) a 21st Century electricity system could be powered 100% by renewables, over what time period and whether the overall costs of this would be acceptable (1) they keep cropping up. I consider them to be fallacies.
( For Five Fallacies Facing Renewables - Read On )
https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2021/09/fossil-fuels-are-dead.html#comments
on Charles Stross' blog, and the comments, and it occurred to me that I see a similar set of arguments advanced whenever renewables are discussed. Specifically when considering how (and whether) a 21st Century electricity system could be powered 100% by renewables, over what time period and whether the overall costs of this would be acceptable (1) they keep cropping up. I consider them to be fallacies.
( For Five Fallacies Facing Renewables - Read On )
