Date: 2012-02-23 03:18 pm (UTC)
I am sorry for the pain I have unwittingly caused you.

I think the important bit of data missing from your comment is how many routes stayed open that would otherwise have closed.

Hidden in this is the question of subsidy. How much subsidy were the buses attracting? How much of this subsidy was reduced and handed back to tax payers instead of spent on additional services? Difficult to tell.

We could see no more routes opened up but a big reduction in subsidy. Which would not be a bad thing but it wouldn’t be my favourite thing to do with the saving.

The issue of crowd control, anti-social behaviour and collection of fares is one to puzzle over.

Mind you, the survielance opportunities now available to bus companies coupled with the fact that if you are on a self-driving bus you have just stepped onto a moving prison might make serious anti-social behaviour less of a problem.

I think we would see wholesale replacement of buses. The savings from replacing a bus (and driver) mid way through its live with a self-driven bus are I think strongly NPV positive. Especially, if you can persuade / con some city in India to take the old buses off your hands for some money.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

danieldwilliam: (Default)
danieldwilliam

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112 131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 05:35 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios