Date: 2023-09-18 02:39 pm (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
If you are correct (and I think you are) then, yes that's the interesting question.

It would make the project schedule really contingent and judgemental. If the main driver of publishing or not is whether the lawyers are comfortable that publishing the story won't lead to big legal liabilities then the timetable is in the lap of their judgement and any contingent items that they consider important. Those feel like they are going to be bespoke to each set of stories and not necessarily linear. Three cross-corroborating accounts might be sufficient but perhaps not if you have doubts about whether one of the complainers will stick the course or might not be a credible witness in court. Four might enough to publish today but if you think a fifth complainer is close to agreeing to be included you might hang off until they are committed.

You could spend months finding 4 or 5 or 6 complainers and then very quickly get them to a point where they are all comfortable or (more likely) have to spend many many more months winning trust in a complex network of mutual support and journalistic and editorial credibility.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting

Profile

danieldwilliam: (Default)
danieldwilliam

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18 192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 23rd, 2025 11:45 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios