Naah - rioting is a bypassing of democracy, because while the will of _some_ people is expressed, there's no equality in reaching a decision.
Rioting, IMHO, occurs when there is a significant democratic deficit, or where people are unhappy, and believe (rightly or wrongly) that democracy will not fix this.
As one of the commentators says, I think the most likely response to the kind of poor leadership that leads to mutinies in static organisations is a mass walk out.
Which is fine if you have somewhere else to go or have valuable transferable skills to take to the market.
In my head rioting is a failure of democracy, or an assertion of anarchy. If the rioters were getting an outcome they liked from participatory democracy, they wouldn't be rioting.
no subject
Rioting, IMHO, occurs when there is a significant democratic deficit, or where people are unhappy, and believe (rightly or wrongly) that democracy will not fix this.
no subject
no subject
http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2013/04/is_it_time_to_stage_a_mutiny.html
no subject
That's useful advice in a bundle.
no subject
Which is fine if you have somewhere else to go or have valuable transferable skills to take to the market.
no subject
If the rioters were getting an outcome they liked from participatory democracy, they wouldn't be rioting.
no subject