http://danieldwilliam.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] danieldwilliam 2012-11-15 05:24 pm (UTC)

Interesting article. I’m not sure I share Kettle’s view (as implied) that the rise of China is going to result in low growth for the UK.

Nor do I share Ryan Bourne of the Centre for Policy Studies response that low-tax, low-regulation policy responses are the only answer or an entire answer.

http://www.cps.org.uk/blog/q/date/2012/11/15/there-is-no-global-race-and-prosperity-is-not-zero-sum/

The OECD report on which both of these articles are based see UK GDP trend growth to 2011 as 2.3%. Over the next few decades they forecast 1.9% then rising for the three decades to 2060 2.2%.

For per capita GDP growth the figures are 1.9%, 1.3% and 1.8%..

1.9% GDP growth on average over the next two decades is okay. I’ll take that. Compared to the effectively zero growth we’ve seen for the last few years 1.9% growth is going to feel like paradise.

Big assumption in the OECD forecast is that people continue to retire at 65. Which I personally just don’t see happening. Either structurally in terms of the rules or through individual choice.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting