http://danieldwilliam.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] danieldwilliam 2012-11-14 02:07 pm (UTC)

And that strikes me as at least as good an educated guess as anyone else’s.

But the implications of your view being correct are not fun. Mainly because I think we have already spent all the extra money your lower growth assumption brings in and maybe a bit more besides.


As a tangent I worry that holders of capital couldn’t find some assets more productive to invest their surplus cash in than a series of bubbles. I think that’s a bit of a worry for the labour forces of the West mainly, but also the East.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting