ext_550458: (Cicero history)
http://strange-complex.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] strange-complex.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] danieldwilliam 2012-06-26 04:29 pm (UTC)

Thanks - very interesting. I see there's a marked jump in non-transferred ballots after the 9th round, even though some very low-ranked preferences must have come into play towards the end. It shows that ranking as far as possible can really be worthwhile. I studiously ranked all 12 candidates on my paper, although I doubt it made much difference in my case, as my rankings were very similar to the final outcome. I put Vicky Seddon and Stuart Weir first and second, while ranking most of the people who got eliminated early on very low down.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting