danieldwilliam: (Default)
[personal profile] danieldwilliam

There is a phrase of Iain M Banks of which I am becoming increasingly fond. He often talks of the moral event horizon but I’ve never seen him define the term.

 I’ve been thinking about this, this morning, in the context of if and how one chooses to engage in political activity within or without a system that is flawed (and perhaps deliberately so).

 For me the moral event horizon is where you reach a situation where it is impossible to act morally, where all the available means are to some extent immoral. A little deeper in and there is the situation where all of the ends are to some extent immoral.

  How would you define the moral event horizon?

 I’d be interested to hear anyone’s views.


Date: 2011-05-08 09:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] psychochicken.livejournal.com
Very interesting. I think I agree with this. For me it's when you have come to a realisation that a choice/decision/action you take based on a moral belief actually reshapes your ideas on some other things. Morals and beliefs are pretty abstract things - this is where they become real, in that they shape your worldview and actions.

Not half as erudite as the above but I think we're on the same page.

Profile

danieldwilliam: (Default)
danieldwilliam

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18 192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 20th, 2025 03:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios