Paul Dietz ([personal profile] neowolf2) wrote in [personal profile] danieldwilliam 2021-09-06 09:58 pm (UTC)

Geothermal has the same problem as nuclear: it's a low operating cost, high fixed cost energy source. So it either operates in baseload mode or it gets much more expensive. It does not play very well with renewables.

It might make sense for high latitude small communities, since it scales down better than nuclear. It also should work better in cold climates, which helps in extracting work from lower grade heat. Perhaps it can complement solar, which could help compensate for lower efficiency of geothermal during the arctic summer.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting